MMTC has moved its board meeting to May 29, 2026, to discuss the audited financial results. To adhere to insider trading rules, trading will remain closed for 48 hours following these results.

MMTC Ltd has announced a board meeting on May 28, 2026, aiming to examine and approve the finalized financial reports for Q4 and the full year of 2026, both for standalone and consolidated results.

The Nifty SmallCap index has risen by 16.8% since its March lows, reaching a significant level near the 200-day moving average at 16,550, indicating a possible bullish reversal. Analysts forecast potential gains of up to 50% for South Indian Bank, Cupid, and MMTC due to robust technical signals and increased volume accumulation.

MMTC Ltd reports no recent events impacting its share price or trading volume, assuring adherence to SEBI's LODR Regulation 2015 reporting standards.

IJBA has made it clear that only MMTC is authorized to import gold, with other requests for gold imports reportedly being denied.

Tightened gold import regulations have boosted MMTC's market position, with the company's shares rising by 11.3% to Rs 68.94. The supply crunch and regulatory hurdles facing other importers have worked in MMTC's favor.

VST Industries saw a significant 20% jump in its stock price, with increased trading volume, as the company reported a doubling of its Q4FY26 profit after tax (PAT). Similarly, SCI experienced a similar rise and secured a deal for green methanol shipments under NGHM, contributing to positive market sentiment.

Import importers are seeking clarity from the DGFT regarding concessional duties amid ongoing challenges with GST. The import of no-Dore gold has halted for the past three months, with only MMTC and IIBX applications being accepted since April 1.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has approved a one-time settlement of Rs 1,950 crore for NSEL, despite MMTC's opposition. The ruling follows an agreement by over 90% creditors. Previously, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) had suggested fraud in the scheme, but the NCLAT found these claims to be incorrect rather than fraudulent. No objections were raised by the Enforcement Directorate, Economic Offenses Wing, or Market Regulation and Supervision Committee.